About Uni Grotesk, a Central European geometric Sans
Uni Grotesk is a modern adaptation of the ubiquitous but awkward Universal Grotesk, a typeface that dominated communist Czechoslovakia.
I remember looking at this book cover every evening before falling asleep. I was perhaps 13 or 14, and I didn’t really know who Franz Kafka was, but this book with the weird ‘f’ on the spine caught my attention. These kinds of details continued to catch my eye, and as I became more aware of lettershapes and of typography, I realised that this descending ‘f’ was rather common. In particular, this typeface, Universal Grotesk, was used everywhere throughout communist Czechoslovakia, appearing on everything from posters to road signs, from packaging to newspaper headlines, from our local version of transfer letters (Propisot) to instruction manuals of all kinds (perhaps its most fitting use).
Examples of Universal Grotesk in use. Top left: all elevators in Czechoslovakia included operation instructions set in Universal Grotesk. Top right: The typeface had been used on the traffic signage as a normative typeface for Czechoslovakia, and then in both Czech Republic and Slovakia in the 1990s. Until recently, it had been the standard typeface for highways signage in Slovakia; from 2014, it is being replaced by Tern, designed by the Austrian-based International Institute for Information Design. Below: A random selection of books using Universal Grotesk, all these books come from the 1960s to 1980s. After the arrival of digital technologies Universal Grotesk has virtually disappeared.
Despite its name, which was a slight nod to Bauhaus’ Universalschrift, its shapes were far from being universal. It was a quirky geometric sans, uneven and full of idiosyncratic details, such as the spurless ‘u’ and ‘b’; descending ‘f’, uneven text colour and odd proportions (for example, the very wide, circular ‘e’ and ‘b’). Still, it was such an omnipresent part of daily life that I began to consider the descending ‘f’ and spurless ‘u’ normal, and all other forms strange, and it is not surprising that Fedra Sans (2001) also sports a descending ‘f’, not a direct reference to Universal Grotesk, but a sign of unconscious influences from my childhood.
Undated Grafotechna type specimen presenting Universal Grotesk.
Awkward as it may be, it still holds a place in my heart, and I felt that a deft adaptation could be a useful addition to the modern repertoire, so I started to do some research, expecting that a font this ubiquitous must surely have been well documented. Surprisingly, however, very little is known about it. It was distributed by Grafotechna, a conglomerate Czechoslovak type foundry established in 1951, but the shapes of Universal point to much earlier origins. In Grafotechna’s catalogues there is no mention of the original designer’s name, nor the date of publication. The only information I could find about Universal Grotesk was in Jaspert, Berry & Johnson’s Encyclopaedia of Typefaces, which dates the design to 1922. That would make it the first geometric sans. Who designed it? When? Where? Why?
The Grafotechna type specimens in my library were of no help, so I asked the design historian Otakar Karlas, who is a walking encyclopaedia of Czech typography, but he had no definite information either. I checked with other older Czech type designers like František Štorm and Jan Solpera, all of whom obviously knew the typeface intimately, but had no idea about its origins. Karlas speculated that it might not have been a Czechoslovak design at all, but a German design that somehow ended up at Grafotechna, since it bears a marked similarity to Erbar-Grotesk, (Ludwig & Mayer type foundry, 1926), which also was used on street signs in Germany. An early printed specimen supports this claim, as the Czech diacritics are poorly constructed.
Erbar-Grotesk is the first geometric sans-serif typeface produced by Ludwig & Mayer, and designed by Jakob Erbar in 1922.
I decided to follow the German trail and emailed Indra Kupferschmid, who replied just minutes later. ‘This looks like Kristall-Grotesk by one of my favourite confusing foundries Wagner,’ she wrote, and in fact Universal Grotesk looks just like Kristall-Grotesk, with the exception of a few alternate glyphs.
According to Indra, ‘Universal Grotesk is based on matrices by Wagner & Schmidt, Leipzig, cast and sold by Norddeutsche Schriftgießerei, Berlin, and other type foundries such as J. John Söhne in Hamburg or C. E. Weber in Stuttgart.’ After 1945, the remains of Wagner & Schmidt, Leipzig, were merged into East Germany’s Typoart foundry. Czechoslovakia’s Grafotechna must have gotten the matrices from them at some point in the 1950s. After so many years, I finally had my answer!
Kristall-Grotesk produced by Wagner & Schmidt in 1936–37 in Leipzig. The same design was released in different markets under the names Polar, Rund Grotesk, Saxo, and Predilecta.
In 2013, I asked Hrvoje Živčić to digitise scans of Universal Grotesk from the 1960s Gratotechna specimens. That, however, was only the beginning of the project. Typefaces of that era didn’t come in well planned families of fonts designed to work smoothly together, and Universal Grotesk was no exception. In Light, for example, the x-height is too small, increasing dramatically in darker weights, and the Italics seem to come from a different, uncredited design unrelated to the upright styles. The Condensed version is probably the most useful addition to the family, quite different from the Standard style of Universal Grotesk in the design of letters such as b, G and W, and with more refined details and optical corrections.
It was clear that Universal would require extensive adjustments, and after experimenting with the proportions, we decided to increase the x-height of the lighter cuts. And not only did I have to adjust the proportions of nearly all the individual letters, I also had to work to establish more systematic connections between all the styles.
Original cuts of Universal Grotesk (below) ranged widely in proportions. Digital version of Uni Grotesk creates optical relationships between weights and width.
As usual, I worked with Nikola Djurek in the final design stages, and together we also designed a Display version loosely based on the capitals-only version of Kristall-Grotesk (lichtfetter Versalien).
Uni Grotesk Display
Neither Universal or Kristall-Grotesk had suitable Italic versions, so Uni Grotesk Italic is a completely new design based on the upright styles.
Italic version of Universal Grotesk uses different weight, different proportions and different constructions of numbers and some letters. For example, compare capital M, or the numbers 2 and 4.
As ubiquitous as Universal Grotesk was, it disappeared, never making the transition from metal to digital type. Our new Uni Grotesk is a refinement of the typeface and well suited for contemporary use, with its particularly Central European flavour of early 20th century geometric sans. Uni Grotesk is a new typeface with a purpose and function, with geometric structure and elementary letterforms, and with flavourful details that lend this sans its unique character.
Uni Grotesk and Uni Grotesk Condensed from Typotheque, 2016.
A note about the typeface name:
Inspired by musical composition, where assigned Opus number indicates the chronological order of the composer's production, I also number my typefaces. Since 1995, I’ve been naming them alphabetically, so I have Eureka (1995), Fedra (2001), Greta (2007), History (2008), Irma (2009), Julien (2010), Karloff (2012), Lava (2013). The next one should logically start with a ‘M’. Just like some composers selectively number their pieces, leaving their early work, experiments, or unpublished compositions, I left out some experiment such as Bodytype (2011), and I am leaving out Uni Grotesk, which is not my original design.
Other Articles By Peter Biľak
- Why Not Associates?2
- The Book of Probes
- Restart: New Systems in Graphic Design
- Contemporary Dutch graphic design: an insider/outsiders view
- Type design in the 1990s, Demystification and re-mystification
- Dutch type design
- Martin Majoor, type designer
- Irma Boom, book designer
- Designing Type Systems
- Karel Martens, graphic designer
- Letterror, designers and programmers
- Max Kisman, graphic designer
- In search of a comprehensive type design theory
- Experimental typography. Whatever that means.
- Martin Majoor feature
- History of a new font (notes on designing Fedra Serif)
- Sandberg, Designer and Director of Stedelijk
- En busca de una teoría completa del diseño tipográfico
- Historia de una fuente nueva
- Acerca de Fedra
- Falta de diseño, exceso de diseño y volver a diseñar
- Tipografía de los noventa. La demistificación y re-mistificación
- Designing Type — book review
- Graphic Design in the White Cube
- Kyoorius DesignYatra 2006, review of a design conference
- Ways of Seeing, book review
- À la recherche d’une théorie générale du dessin de caractères
- 화이트큐브의 그래픽디자인 / Graphic Design in the White Cube
- What is Typography?
- Family planning, or how type families work
- A View of Latin Typography in Relationship to the World
- Jan van Toorn, Critical Practice
- In the Name Of the Father (or the troubles with L-caron)
- The history of History
- Methods of Distribution: Digital Fonts and the Global Market
- Méthodes de distribution : les caractères numériques sur le marché mondial
- Font hinting
- Beauty and Ugliness in Type design
- Conceptual Type?
- We don’t need new fonts…
- Julien — the making of
- Type design competitions
- Una mirada a la relación de la tipografía de origen latino con el mundo
- Métodos de distribución: Tipos digitales en el mercado global
- Typography and technology and typography
- Irma Boom interview
- Lava — Voice of a Magazine
- Caratteri concettuali?
- Related Type Families
- Verwandte Schriftfamilien
- Designing Hebrew Type
- Notes on Designing and Producing the Typeface Wind